Art and architecture of Babylonia and Assyria
|
|
The culture of Assyria, and still more of Babylonia, was essentially
literary; we miss in it the artistic spirit of Egypt or Greece.
In Babylonia the abundance of clay and lack of stone led to the use
of brick; Babylonian temples are massive but shapeless structures of
crude brick, supported by buttresses, the rain being carried off by
drains, one of which at Ur was of lead. The use of brick led to the
early development of the pilaster and column, and of frescoes and
enameled tiles. The walls were brilliantly colored, and sometimes
plated with bronze or gold, as well as with tiles. Painted
terra-cotta cones were also embedded in the plaster.
Assyria, copying Babylonian architecture, also built its palaces and
temples of brick, even when stone was the natural building material
of the country, and faithfully preserving the brick platform,
necessary in the marshy soil of Babylonia, but little needed in the
north. |
As time went on, however, later Assyrian architects began to shake
themselves free of Babylonian influences, and to use stone as well
as brick. The walls of the Assyrian palace were lined with
sculptured and colored slabs of stone, instead of being painted as
in Chaldea. We can trace three periods in the art of these
bas-reliefs: it is vigorous but simple under Ashurnasirpal II,
careful and realistic under Sargon II, and refined but wanting in
boldness under Ashurbanipal.
In Babylonia, in place of the bas relief, we have the figure in the
round, the earliest examples being the statues from Telloh that are
realistic but somewhat clumsy. The lack of stone in Babylonia made
every pebble precious, and led to a high perfection in the art of
gem-cutting.
Nothing can be better than two seal-cylinders that have come down to
us from the age of Sargon of Akkad. No remarkable specimens of
metallurgy of an early period have been found, apart perhaps from
the silver vase of Entemena; but at a later epoch, great excellence
was attained in the manufacture of such jewellery as ear-rings and
bracelets of gold. Copper, too, was worked with skill; indeed, it is
possible that Babylonia was the original home of copper-working.
At any rate, the people were famous at an early date for their
embroideries and rugs. The ceramic history of Babylonia and Assyria
has unfortunately not yet (as of 1911) been traced. We do not even
know the date of the spirited terracotta relief's discovered by
Loftus and Rawlinson.
The forms of Assyrian pottery are graceful; the porcelain, like the
glass discovered in the palaces of Nineveh, was derived from
Egyptian originals. Transparent glass seems to have been first
introduced in the reign of Sargon. Stone, clay and glass were used
to make vases, and vases of hard stone have been dug up at Telloh
similar to those of the early dynastic period of Egypt.Comnenan and Paleologan periodsIn Constantinople and Asia Minor the architecture of the Comnenan
period is almost non-existant, with the notable exception of the
Elmali Kilise and other rock sanctuaries of Cappadocia. Much
architecture survives on the outskirts of the Byzantine world, where
the national forms of architecture came into being: in the
Transcaucasian countries, in Russia, Bulgaria, Serbia, and other
Slavic lands; and also in Sicily (Cappella Palatina) and Veneto (St
Mark's Basilica, Torcello Cathedral).
The Paleologan period is well-represented in a dozen churches of
Constantinople, notably St Saviour at Chora and St Mary
Pammakaristos. Unlike their Slavic counterparts, the Paleologan
architects never accented the vertical thrust of structures. As a
result, there is little grandeur in the late medieval architecture
of Byzantium (barring the Hagia Sophia of Trapezunt).
The church of Holy Apostles in Thessaloniki is often cited as an
archetypal structure of the late period, when the exterior walls
were intricately decorated with complex brickwork patterns or with
glazed ceramics. Other churches from the years immediately predating
the fall of Constantinople survive on Mount Athos and in Mistra
(e.g., Brontocheion monastery).
As early as the building of Constantine's churches in Palestine
there were two chief types of plan in use: the basilican, or axial,
type, represented by the basilica at the Holy Sepulchre, and the
circular, or central, type, represented by the great octagonal
church once at Antioch. Those of the latter type we must suppose
were nearly always vaulted, for a central dome would seem to furnish
their very raison d'etre. The central space was sometimes surrounded
by a very thick wall, in which deep recesses, to the interior, were
formed, as at the noble church of St George, Salonica (5th century),
or by a vaulted aisle, as at Sta Costanza, Rome (4th century); or
annexes were thrown out from the central space in such a way as to
form a cross, in which these additions helped to counterpoise the
central vault, as at the Mausoleum of Galla Placidia, Ravenna (5th
century). The most famous church of this type was that of the Holy
Apostles, Constantinople. Vaults appear to have been early applied
to the basilican type of plan; for instance, at Hagia Irene,
Constantinople (6th century), the long body of the church is covered
by two domes.
At St Sergius, Constantinople, and San Vitale, Ravenna, churches of
the central type, the space under the dome was enlarged by having
apsidal additions made to the octagon. Finally, at Hagia Sophia (6th
century) a combination was made which is perhaps the most remarkable
piece of planning ever contrived. A central space of 100 ft (30 m)
square is increased to 200 ft (60 m) in length by adding two
hemicycles to it to the east and the west; these are again extended
by pushing out three minor apses eastward, and two others, one on
either side of a straight extension, to the west. This unbroken
area, about 260 ft (80 m) long, the larger part of which is over 100
ft (30 m) wide, is entirely covered by a system of domical surfaces.
Above the conchs of the small apses rise the two great semi-domes
which cover the hemicycles, and between these bursts out the vast
lome over the central square. On the two sides, to the north and
south of the dome, it is supported by vaulted aisles in two storey's
which bring the exterior form to a general square.
At the Holy Apostles (6th century) five domes were applied to a
cruciform plan, that in the midst being the highest. After the 6th
century there were no churches built which in any way competed in
scale with these great works of Justinian, and the plans more or
less tended to approximate to one type. The central area covered by
the dome was included in a considerably larger square, of which the
four divisions, to the east, west, north and south, were carried up
higher in the vaulting and roof system than the four corners,
forming in this way a sort of nave and transepts. Sometimes the
central space was square, sometimes octagonal, or at least there
were eight piers supporting the dome instead of four, and the nave
and transepts were narrower in proportion.
If we draw a square and divide each side into three so that the
middle parts are greater than the others, and then divide the area
into nine from these points, we approximate to the typical setting
out of a plan of this time. Now add three apses on the east side
opening from the three divisions, and opposite to the west put a
narrow entrance porch running right across the front. Still in front
put a square court. The court is the atrium and usually has a
fountain in the middle under a canopy resting on pillars. The
entrance porch is the narthex. Directly under the center of the dome
is the ambo, from which the Scriptures were proclaimed, and beneath
the ambo at floor level was the place for the choir of singers.
Across the eastern side of the central square was a screen which
divided off the bema, where the altar was situated, from the body of
the church; this screen, bearing images, is the iconostasis. The
altar was protected by a canopy or ciborium resting on pillars. Rows
of rising seats around the curve of the apse with the patriarch's
throne at the middle eastern point formed the synthronon. The two
smaller compartments and apses at the sides of the bema were
sacristies, the diaconicon and prothesis. The ambo and bema were
connected by the solea, a raised walkway enclosed by a railing or
low wall.
The continuous influence from the East is strangely shown in the
fashion of decorating external brick walls of churches built about
the 12th century, in which bricks roughly carved into form are set
up so as to make bands of ornamentation which it is quite clear are
imitated from Cufic writing. This fashion was associated with the
disposition of the exterior brick and stone work generally into many
varieties of pattern, zig-zags, key-patterns &c.; and, as similar
decoration is found in many Persian buildings, it is probable that
this custom also was derived from the East. The domes and vaults to
the exterior were covered with lead or with tiling of the Roman
variety. The window and door frames were of marble. The interior
surfaces were adorned all over by mosaics or frescoes in the higher
parts of the edifice, and below with incrustations of marble slabs,
which were frequently of very beautiful varieties, and disposed so
that, although in one surface, the coloring formed a series of large
panels. The better marbles were opened out so that the two surfaces
produced by the division formed a symmetrical pattern resembling
somewhat the marking of skins of beasts. |
 |